Overview

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

6.2

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

78.6 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

96.4 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 78.6%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 2.8 5.6 4.3 4.5 4.0 6.9 2.7 30.7 89.6% 1.0
Article, other 1.0 NA 0.1 NA NA NA NA 1.1 100.0% 1.0
Conference paper, peer review 1.7 NA 1.3 NA 2.0 NA 1.0 6.0 22.6% 0.8
Conference paper, other 0.7 0.5 0.2 1.4 0.2 NA 1.6 4.4 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA 0.2 NA NA 0.2 0.0% 1.0
Report NA NA 0.3 NA 1.0 NA NA 1.3 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 9 15 18 12 11 14 9 88 92.0% 1
Article, other 1 NA 1 NA NA NA NA 2 100.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 6 NA 4 NA 3 NA 3 16 31.2% 1
Conference paper, other 3 3 1 4 1 NA 2 14 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA 1 0.0% 1
Report NA NA 1 NA 3 NA NA 4 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.1 13.1 2.6 2.7 52.4%
2015 5.6 14.2 2.5 1.3 23.9%
2016 4.3 22.9 5.3 0.4 9.7%
2017 4.0 10.3 2.6 1.4 36.6%
2018 3.4 12.6 3.7 1.5 44.4%
Total 22.4 73.1 3.3 7.4 33.0%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.5 1.25 1.6 12.8%
2015-2017 12.7 1.09 1.6 12.8%
2016-2018 10.5 0.97 1.2 11.2%
2017-2019 11.3 0.67 0.8 6.9%
Total 23.8 0.98 2.4 10.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 55.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 12.5 1.18 3.2 25.2%
2015-2017 12.6 1.12 2.9 23.4%
2016-2018 10.4 1.11 2.6 25.2%
2017-2019 11.1 1.05 1.8 16.5%
2018-2020 11.0 1.09 2.0 17.8%
Total 26.4 1.12 5.8 21.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 29 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 41 13 31.7% 28 68.3%
2015-2017 42 15 35.7% 31 73.8%
2016-2018 36 14 38.9% 27 75.0%
2017-2019 30 11 36.7% 20 66.7%
2018-2020 29 10 34.5% 18 62.1%
Total 80 27 33.8% 55 68.8%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 29 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Switzerland 28 28 0 0 0 11.1
Iceland 8 8 0 0 0 3.3
United Kingdom 11 11 0 0 0 2.6
Canada 5 5 0 0 0 2.0
China 9 9 0 0 0 2.0
Finland 9 9 0 0 0 1.4
Spain 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
France 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Chile 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) Institute Switzerland 27 27 0 0 0 10.8
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 8 8 0 0 0 3.5
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 17 17 0 0 0 3.4
University of Iceland University Iceland 8 8 0 0 0 3.3
Carleton University University Canada 3 3 0 0 0 1.7
University of Nottingham University United Kingdom 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 8 8 0 0 0 1.6
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.4
Aalto University University Finland 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Aston University University United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) University Switzerland 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Castilla–La Mancha (UCLM) University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Nanjing Forestry University University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
University of Cantabria University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Pavement Technology Inc Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Taihu University of Wuxi University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Ammann Group Company Switzerland 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Paul Scherrer Institute Institute Switzerland 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of British Columbia University Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Arizona State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Grenoble Institute of Technology University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Linnaeus University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Shahrood University of Technology University Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Guilan University Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Tongji University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
VTT Technical Research Centre Institute Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Bangor University University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Atlas Copco Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Lund University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Bío-Bío University Chile 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Göttingen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Tampere University of Technology University Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Hong Kong Polytechnic University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NANJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Shandong Cifi Yinshengtai Grp NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
South China University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Southeast University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Västra Götalandsregionen Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Wuhan University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Accsys Technologies PLC Company Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Danish Waste Solutions Other Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ghent University University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
SINTEF Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Geotechnical Institute Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour (UPPA) University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Dalian University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Bath University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Institute Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Melbourne University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of New England University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Open Access

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 14 4 0 0 3 1 10 28.6%
2015 14 2 0 0 2 0 12 14.3%
2016 20 3 0 0 1 2 17 15.0%
2017 12 5 2 1 1 1 7 41.7%
2018 14 8 1 3 3 1 6 57.1%
2019 14 9 2 4 2 1 5 64.3%
2020 11 8 3 4 1 0 3 72.7%
Total 99 39 8 12 13 6 60 39.4%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

BUILDING MATERIALS

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.1 60.9 11.9 1.7 33.9%
2015 5.6 92.8 16.6 0.0 0.0%
2016 5.1 71.9 14.2 0.8 15.6%
2017 4.5 22.2 5.0 1.9 41.9%
2018 5.7 22.3 3.9 1.9 33.6%
2019 6.9 31.8 4.6 2.2 31.6%
2020 3.0 6.5 2.1 0.6 19.6%
Total 35.8 308.3 8.6 9.1 25.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 88.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.7 1.17 2.6 19.3%
2015-2017 13.1 1.01 2.2 16.6%
2016-2018 12.3 0.70 1.2 9.6%
2017-2019 13.0 0.66 0.7 5.4%
Total 26.7 0.92 3.4 12.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 12.7 1.69 9.8 77.7%
2015-2017 13.4 1.66 10.3 76.9%
2016-2018 11.8 1.66 8.8 74.6%
2017-2019 13.1 1.62 10.4 79.6%
2018-2020 12.5 1.65 9.6 76.8%
Total 28.7 1.67 22.1 77.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 49 0 0.0% 34 69.4%
2015-2017 46 1 2.2% 34 73.9%
2016-2018 43 1 2.3% 30 69.8%
2017-2019 37 1 2.7% 24 64.9%
2018-2020 37 0 0.0% 23 62.2%
Total 97 1 1.0% 67 69.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 37 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row